Which of the following represents a common error in literature reviews?

Arguments not being supported with facts and citations is a significant error in literature reviews because the primary purpose of a literature review is to establish a framework for understanding the current state of research on a particular topic. It is essential for the validity of the review that the arguments presented are backed by empirical evidence and properly cited sources. Without this support, the review may lack credibility and rigor, rendering the conclusions drawn from it questionable.

When arguments are unsupported, it not only undermines the author's position but also fails to engage the reader's trust in the findings and interpretations presented. Providing adequate citations and backing each argument with relevant data ensures that the literature review remains a reliable resource for both researchers and practitioners trying to navigate the existing knowledge in the field.

In contrast, while overuse of quotes, reliance on recent studies, or the omission of conclusions can also present issues in a literature review, they do not strike at the core of the review's purpose as profoundly as lacking supporting facts and citations does. Those other issues could affect the quality or readability of the review, but the foundation of an effective literature review is its factual and evidentiary support.